Back to News and Publications

pdf version

Fall 2004
Vol. 12 No. 2

Features

Alumni Relations

Faculty Highlights

College and Campus News

credits


Jump to a section in the article:

Chemical biology at the undergrad level

Chemical biology at the grad level

Nano science and engineering

Nano courses

Nanotechnology club

Focused options in chemical engineering

Still a few walls to knock down

Related sites

When Fields Intersect: Education at the Boundaries of Disciplines

There’s never been a better time than now to be a Berkeley student interested in solving problems at the boundaries of traditional disciplines. New degree programs have been established in the college, and new institutes devoted to interdisciplinary education and research have sprouted up, including QB3 (the California Institute of Quantitative Biomedical Research) and the BBNI (Berkeley Nanosciences and Nanoengineering Institute). New courses have been added on such topics as quantum computing and chemical nanotechnology, and degree requirements have been tweaked to address changes in both the professional world as well as in the laboratory.

“Education is following what happens both in research fields and in the job market. In both cases there has been an increase in activities in areas that fall between traditional disciplines. When it is no longer obvious how to prepare students for changes in the workplace using the more traditional majors, then the education needs to change, evolving new majors and minors,” said Herbert Strauss, Associate Dean for Undergraduate Affairs. Supporting Strauss’s observation, chemistry professor Michael Marletta noted, “The traditional departments— chemistry, biology, physics—were set up in British universities back in the middle-ages, but they forgot to tell nature.”

Chemical Biology at the Undergraduate Level
One of the major changes in the Department of Chemistry is the new prominence of chemical biology at both the undergraduate and graduate level. “We want to give students a strong background in traditional chemistry combined with a new sensibility on how to apply it to biological problems,” said chemistry professor Carolyn Bertozzi.

Undergraduates in the college can pursue the new B.S. degree in chemical biology, which teaches biology in the manner in which it is being used in research. “Biology has changed enormously in the past decade, but the curricula had not. The field is much more quantitative and molecular now, and there is a large demand for chemists and biologists well-versed in the molecular, structural, and computational areas,” explained chemistry professor emeritus Ken Sauer, who had a lead role designing the new major.

“We have formalized and organized what was a natural evolution, providing an administrative umbrella and a set curriculum to guide the students,” said Marletta. “Solving problems doesn't have to occur at the interface of disciplines, but unless a scientist has specific training, diving into the unknown can be scary.”

This major is aimed at students who want to work in the rapidly growing areas of research in molecular and quantitative biology. And, as both Dean Heathcock and Chair Harris mention in their columns, students are lining up for this program, which has a current enrollment of 138 undergraduates.

Two new courses—Chem 103 and Chem 135—are aimed at chemical biology students and are proving quite popular. Noted Marletta, who teaches Chem 135, an introduction to biochemistry for chemistry majors, “I think the department was surprised at how popular this degree is turning out to be, Chem 135 being a prime example. The first time this class was taught two years ago there were 20 students. This year there are 130 students, mainly chemistry and chemical biology students or joint majors.”

Chem 103 focuses on inorganic chemistry in living systems and replaces both Chem 104A and 104B for chemical biology majors. Said chemistry professor Chris Chang, who is teaching the newly-offered course, “We have about 80 students enrolled, which is the same class size as Chem 104A. [Since it’s a new class, we’re] still hashing out the order and presentation of some topics, but I think we’re hitting a good pace now for everyone.”

Chemical Biology at the Graduate level

Christina Shenvi, a graduate student in the CBGP, at a recent poster session, where students get out of their labs and mingle with one another and with faculty members

In only its fourth year, the Chemical Biology Graduate Program (CBGP) is already looking to expand. “We have a National Institutes of Health training grant that supports six students per year, but our actual target is ten students a year,” said Bertozzi, who co-directs the program with Michael Marletta, a professor of chemistry and of biochemistry and molecular biology. “But the funding is coming together: Chiron has recently donated one fellowship, and we are actively looking for more sponsors.”

The CBGP spans several departments, including chemistry, chemical engineering, molecular and cell biology, and bioengineering. Students apply to a home department first, and then later to the CBGP once they decide to matriculate at Berkeley. Once in the program, they have access to a wide pool of faculty members, as 36 professors from the four departments participate in the program. The CBGP also requires that graduate students complete three lab rotations in their first year so they can experience a multidisciplinary educational approach.

“I think that I really benefited from the rotation system,” said Kevin McCusker, a CBGP student working with chemistry professor Judith Klinman. “I found that it encourages collaboration and promotes networking, because we are interacting with more scientists and getting more exposure to different fields.”

There is also a social component to the CBGP. “Departments provide a sense of community, loyalty and belonging, which is going to be a challenge for interdisciplinary programs and institutes, which are by definition bigger and more fluid,” observed Susan Marqusee, a professor of molecular and cell biology. “The CBGP aims to provide that community feel, hosting bi-monthly poster sessions where the students get out of their labs and mingle with one another and with faculty members.”

Currently the CBGP is looking to establish a summer research program for undergraduates from groups that are historically under-represented in chemistry, allowing students in their junior year at California colleges and universities to complete a ten-week summer project here on the Berkeley campus. “This will both expose them to research and encourage them to apply here for graduate school as well,” said Karen Wong, CBGP administrator. “We are applying for funding from federal agencies to support this endeavor; however, we are asking pharmaceutical/biotech companies and private foundations to help launch this wonderful opportunity by providing seed funds.”

QB3
Beyond the degree programs, major institutes have been set up to enhance education and research collaborations at the interface of traditional disciplines. The California Institute for Quantitative Biomedical Research (happily shortened to QB3) was developed as a cooperative effort among three UC campuses—San Francisco, Berkeley and Santa Cruz—to advance the coming biomedical revolution, in which our understanding of biological systems at all levels of complexity will increase dramatically because of the application of the quantitative sciences—mathematics, physics, chemistry and engineering—to biomedical research.

Scheduled for completionin 2006, Stanley Hall will provide space for scientists from six colleges and will be the first building on campus operated by a program.

To train a new generation of students able to integrate fully the quantitative sciences with biology and medical research, QB3 has helped to create a computational and genomic biology program for graduate students and additional new programs aimed especially at undergraduates. "For example, we are starting a new internship program for undergraduates,” said Susan Marqusee, the UC Berkeley QB3 Associate Director. “Students can apply through the institute for a six-to-nine month full-time internship after their junior year. It’s a good way for chemistry and physics students to get training in biotech. Students receive an educational opportunity, some cash, and more in-depth training.

“For graduate students, the new building—Stanley Hall—will be key, providing clusters of expertise. There will be a lot of sharing of equipment and techniques, allowing experts in different fields to interact in a meaningful way,” continued Marqusee. Scheduled for completion in 2006, the new building will house researchers from six different colleges, and will be the largest research building on campus according to Graham Fleming, a professor of chemistry and the UC Berkeley QB3 Director.

“We hope to radically change interdisciplinary education, and I am convinced that we are on the right path. Many of these multidisciplinary institutions are being set up to meet the demands of the students. We have an active group of faculty, and our students are very organized,” emphasized Fleming. “Students can take advantage of state-of-the-art science in various disciplines to study big problems.”

QB3 serves as a central information center for all three campuses, streamlining the distribution ofinformation about biomedical education and research to students and researchers through new seminars, symposia, and an active web site. The Institute also provides the administrative infrastructure to support large-scale multidisciplinary research projects that would not otherwise be possible.

Nanotechnology & nanoscience
Another institute fostering interdisciplinary education and research is the Berkeley Nanosciences and Nanoengineering Institute (BNNI). Nanoscale science, simply put, is the science of doing things on a really small scale, and it is one of the hottest tickets in town. It seems you can hardly open a newspaper today without reading something about how nanoscience and technology will soon change our day-to-day lives. Noted Geoffrey Owens, Dean of Biological Sciences, “Advances in nanoscale science and engineering will catalyze changes of enormous social and economic significance.”

Such large-scale changes in society and in science will require a new type of education. As the National Academy of Sciences recently concluded in its report, Small Wonders, Endless Frontiers: “The new breed of student must have disciplinary depth but also be unafraid to cross disciplinary boundaries, must be energized by talking with colleagues in other fields, enjoy collaboration. He or she must learn the languages and methods used by more than one field.”

“Berkeley will play a key role in educating the next generations of leaders in science and industry,” said chemistry professor Paul Alivisatos. “When nanotechnology begins to have a greater commercial impact, the shortage of trained workers with the necessary skills is likely to emerge as a growth constraint on the industry,” said Alivisatos. “We have top-ranked programs in the relevant disciplines, which is critical for creating a world-class program in nanoscale science and engineering.”

As disciplines evolve and expand, there is a demand from students for these courses to be taught. BNNI is the umbrella organization for expanding and coordinating Berkeley’s research and educational activities in nanoscale science and engineering and is co-chaired by Alivisatos and Tom Kalil, Special Assistant to the Chancellor for Science and Technology. The institute has over eighty participating faculty members from diverse fields in seven departments and will bring in an additional eight faculty members, expanding the research and educational opportunities for both undergraduate and graduate students.

Noted Alivisatos, “Many faculty members involved in nanoscience and nanoengineering report that they are unable to accommodate all of the undergraduate interest in participating in their research groups. They also report that many of their students are getting jobs directly related to their experience as ‘nano-scientists’ as opposed to physicists, chemists or engineers.”

In recognition of the growing importance of all things nano, the campus recently established the Designated Emphasis (DE) in Nanoscale Science to provide specialized multi-disciplinary training and research opportunities to doctoral students in 11 departments and programs. At Berkeley, acquiring a DE is like earning a “minor” with a Ph.D. degree and appears on the transcript. Participating graduate students have access to courses, research opportunities, seminars and internationally renowned faculty across disciplines.

Nano courses
An interdisciplinary curriculum is being established that focuses on nanoscale science and engineering, with faculty members developing new courses at the undergraduate and graduate level.

In the college, chemistry and chemical engineering professor Jean Fréchet has offered a freshman seminar called “Chemistry and the Interface of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.” In addition, chemistry professor Birgitta Whaley has team-taught a course on “Quantum Information Science and Technology,” targeted to seniors and first-year graduate students. “The course was very well received, had an interdisciplinary group of students from the Colleges of Chemistry, L&S and Engineering, and was very rewarding to teach,” said Whaley. “I think that all three professors, two teaching assistants and the students who took it last year would agree that they all learned a great deal.” This is a resounding theme among the faculty: they learn as much from the students as the students do from them.

The Berkeley Nanotechnology Club

The Berkeley Nanotechnology Club’s inaugural event in May drew more than 340 participants, who heard notable
speakers from the fields of banking, industry and academia.

A large demand for nanotech information has been tapped by the Berkeley Nanotechnology Club, which began when a Haas M.B.A. student, doing an independent study on nanotech, sent out a mass e-mail soliciting interest in a nanotech club. Six months later, in May 2004, more than 340 people attended the club’s inaugural event, which brought in speakers from different fields in industry, banking, government and academia. The events was cosponsored by the Colleges of Engineering, Chemistry, and Letters & Science, along with the law and business schools.

The nanoclub and its website improve communication on campus and with the outside world by allowing interested students and friends to quickly and easily access the wealth of research in nanoscience and nanoengineering on campus.

The club is also a way to break out of a narrow field and get exposure to other departments, according to Ryan Layton, co-president of the club and a graduate student in mechanical engineering.

Focused options in chemical engineering
For chemical engineers, educational choices are quite plentiful. In the chemical engineering department, the focused options have long offered a way for undergraduate students to get intimately familiar with a specialized area of research. The current focused options are biotechnology, chemical processing, environmental technology, materials science and technology, and applied physical science.

A few years back, the options were revamped—with the option of “no option” being added to provide more flexibility in scheduling. “I believe that the undergraduate years are ideally suited for a more general education,” said David Graves, chemical engineering professor and the vice chair of undergraduate affairs. “Students may not know what they want to do straightaway, changing their field and subfields multiple times. The ‘no option’ option allows students to take their technical electives in various disciplines so they can learn a bit about lots of fields, such as environmental, biological and materials sciences.”

“Adding required coursework based on evolving interdisciplinary fields is always tricky because we either have to add on to the existing requirements—which is done, as chemical engineering students now need 128 units to get their degree—or we have to take away hours from another discipline, such as physical chemistry, in such a way that the students still receive a comprehensive core of more-traditional chemistry and chemical engineering,” said Strauss.

One course requirement that has been added is MCB 102. “Biology has become relevant to chemical engineers, since many of them go on to be employed in the biotech industry,” explained Strauss.

Still a few walls to knock down
The interdisciplinary degrees and institutes are meeting the demand from students and bringing together scientists from distinct disciplines to work toward similar goals, but challenges to interdisciplinary education and research still lie ahead. Hiring faculty members who work at the interface is traditionally not easy to arrange. Joint appointments require more paperwork and administration.

“It is a relatively new phenomenon to have people involved with other appointments,” observed Dean Clayton Heathcock. “For a long time, Judith Klinman and Jack Kirsch [who have joint appointments with MCB] were unique. Now more than 20 percent of the college faculty members have appointments in another department, including Arup Chakraborty and Jean Fréchet, who have dual appointments in both of our departments.”

Another snag to offering multi-department courses is that, historically, workloads are department-based and resources, such as staff and TA positions, are allocated on this basis. “When courses are taught by a team, it’s unclear which department gets credit,” explained Heathcock. “We need new ways to track and credit this. There currently are not enough multi-department classes for this to be a big problem, but as interdisciplinary centers and majors gain in popularity, it is an issue that needs to be addressed.” In addition, new and often cross-listed courses can be tricky to coordinate in order to avoid duplication.

“We also need to guard against people having less loyalty to their home departments. When professors start teaching in different departments, it makes it harder to focus on administrative work or to take a major administrative job in either department since their loyalty is spread more thinly,” Heathcock continued. “This is not insurmountable, just a new problem.”

Fortunately, Berkeley has the talented and ambitious people ready to work out any kinks that arise through these collaborative efforts.

Related websites:

Chemical biology B.S.: http://chemistry.berkeley.edu/ugrad_info/policies/degree_reqs.html
Chemical Biology Graduate Program: http://cbgp.cchem.berkeley.edu/
QB3: http://www.qb3.org/
Stanley Hall: http://healthsciences.berkeley.edu/facilities/stanley.cfm; watch its construction at http://www.berkeley.edu/webcams/
Nanoscience Initiative: http://nano.berkeley.edu/nanosite/
Berkeley Nanotechnology Club: http://nanoclub.berkeley.edu




© 2004 UC Regents

College of Chemistry|| UC Berkeley